Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Anthrop vs Edward Winter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Anthrop vs Winter analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Anthrop vs Edward Winter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Anthrop 1 - 0 Winter
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anthrop has won 45.45% of points on their second serve, while Winter has won 51.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anthrop, in recent form, has won 52.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Winter has won 51.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.76% and 33.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Anthrop has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Winter has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Anthrop has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 3/ 6), with Winter winning 67.74% (W/L 21/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Anthrop has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 15/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Winter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 100% (W/L 3/ 0), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Anthrop has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 16.67% of matches (W/L 1/ 5), where as Winter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 19/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Anthrop winning 1 times and Winter being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Anthrop winning 2 and Winter winning 0. The last match between Anthrop and Winter was at the M15 Rancho Santa Fe, 01-06-2023, Second, Hard with Jack Anthrop getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Anthrop and Winter have played a deciding set 0 times, with Anthrop winning 0 times and Winter 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Anthrop winning 0, and Winter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anthrop has played against opponents with an average rank of 70.89 while Winter has played against players with an average rank of 145.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anthrop has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Winter has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Anthrop has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Winter has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
887
Rank
839
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
780
Rank
589
High
19
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
46% (21-25)
Career Total W/L
57% (47-35)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
70% (7-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$118,500
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jack Anthrop vs Edward Winter For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Anthrop VS Winter
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Jack Anthrop | Edward Winter |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:0 | 1:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (38/53) | 48% (29/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (23/38) | 45% (13/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (7/15) | 39% (12/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (35/60) | 43% (23/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Jack Anthrop
Player
Edward Winter
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Anthrop | Edward Winter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 70% (7/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 68% (15/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (27/23) | 56% (115/89) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 70% (7/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:10:30 | 1:15:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 226.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (110/176) | 61% (295/485) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (75/110) | 71% (210/295) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (30/66) | 52% (98/190) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (10/20) | 47% (21/45) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (73/166) | 40% (191/483) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 86% (6/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 70% (7/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Jack Anthrop Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Player
Jack Anthrop
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
62%
(
83 of
133)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
59 of
133)
124
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(6) 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Anthrop
Player
Tyler Lee
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shunsuke Mitsui
Player
Jack Anthrop
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
1
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
55 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Jack Anthrop
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Anthrop
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jack Anthrop
Player
Stefan Kozlov
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Jack Anthrop
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Jack Anthrop
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelani Sarr
Player
Jack Anthrop
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
9
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Jack Anthrop
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
82%
(
50 of
61)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Edward Winter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Karlis Ozolins
Player
Edward Winter
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edward Winter
Player
Suk Hyun Choo
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Edward Winter
Player
Kaichi Uchida
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edward Winter
Player
Ku Keon Kang
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edward Winter
Player
Yeongseok Jeong
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Edward Winter
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Winter
Player
Franco Agamenone
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Edward Winter
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
10 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Anthrop Vs Winter Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Anthrop are available here and Winter photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
